ThunderPeel2001 Posted July 19, 2006 Colour me really forgetful then - I went back to MI2 last year after a break of god-knows-how-long and could only remember the outline of the story and barely a quarter of the puzzles. I think I'm much more fluent on MI1 though, since I've replayed that one a lot more over the years. I think it comes down to how "ingrained" the game is in your memory. If you played it over and over (and over) like I did, then it's a lot harder to forget. In fact it might be impossible without an unfortunate blow to the head. I know SMI so well I could probably recite most of it from heart, even though I haven't played through a MI game in years. I've not played MI2 in a long long time though, but there was a time where I'd happily sit and play through the entire game in one go. CMI is great fun when you can't remember how to solve the puzzles, which is great because I've only played it all the way through a few times, so I don't remember everything. I just replayed SMI and MI2 for the first time in, I don't really know, maybe four years. Previously I'd always thought that SMI was better, but I think I've finally come to see the light. LeChuck's Revenge really is the superior game. I still miss the insult sword fighting though. Really? I too, believe that SMI is a better game, but I haven't played through MI2 in quite a while... Is it really a better game? I really enjoy SMI's "completeness" (it feels like a more cohesive story) and its sincerity. I think MI2 was a little bit too cynical for its own good... (it seems to reflect a team that's been pushed up against it because of the success of their previous game). But I haven't played it in a long time, maybe I'm wrong! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brkl Posted July 19, 2006 MI1 > MI2 I can't say which is better, I just prefer MI1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
