ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 22, 2013 On 1/22/2013 at 2:28 PM, brkl said: 60s dream technologies are based on the premise that we would still be doing the same shit we were doing fifty years ago, only better. Instead, we are doing amazing things nobody could have anticipated then. Such as...? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brkl Posted January 22, 2013 Huh? If we're talking about day-to-day technologies like flying cars were supposed to be, smart phones, Google and Wikipedia obviously. Or if you're interested in cutting edge stuff then this thread is a good place to start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThunderPeel2001 Posted January 22, 2013 On 1/22/2013 at 3:57 PM, brkl said: Huh? If we're talking about day-to-day technologies like flying cars were supposed to be, smart phones, Google and Wikipedia obviously. Or if you're interested in cutting edge stuff then this thread is a good place to start. Hmm. I'd take a flying car over a smart phone, I think (You know they predicted iPads in 2001: A Space Odyssey?) It's an interesting point about how interconnectiveness has changed our day-to-day lives, though. I'm still not hugely convinced it's a massive step forward, however technically impressive. I guess I have Luddite tendencies Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brkl Posted January 22, 2013 If you're referring to what I found by Googling it (some years ago I would have had to just watch the film until I came across what you meant), that's a portable, flat device that shows video. Video is easily the least interesting feature an iPad has. Just a legacy technology, basically. IMO forward and backward are meaningless concepts here: without the industrial revolution, the world around us would be doing a whole lot better. But things sure are different and increasingly so. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Luftmensch Posted February 3, 2013 Great lecture about standards of proof in software development by Greg Wilson. Here's some interesting comments on the lecture itself, also worth reading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
melmer Posted October 10, 2013 Ridiculous dude crashes TEDx and performs a fake talk for 20 minutes uninterrupted Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Erkki Posted October 13, 2013 On 2/3/2013 at 5:40 PM, Luftmensch said: Great lecture about standards of proof in software development by Greg Wilson. Here's some interesting comments on the lecture itself, also worth reading. This is pretty good. I want to check out that book. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TychoCelchuuu Posted October 13, 2013 TED talks are lying to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roderick Posted October 13, 2013 An enjoyable read though that was, I find it hard - perhaps due to the late hour - to parse its meaning. I understand that the idea's by Ted can act as an echo chamber to emphasize their profundity (when they may actually be quite banal), but there is surely enough practical knowledge also? At the same time, a lot of Ted is meant to be inspirational, so it's logical it exudes that almost religious touch. The strange man crashing Ted X was worthwhile to watch. Especially around the twelfth minute it gets bonkers. Pity there are no burly men escorting him off at the end, or an admission of any kind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ucantalas Posted October 13, 2013 I don't know if TED talks are "lying", per se. Sure, they're not necessarily always immediately usable in real life situations or applicable to all individuals (but again, what things are?). Like Rodi said, they're really more of an inspirational show, something to help people try and achieve more and be the best they can be.Also, it's not like the article even goes on to explain how it's a lie, just that the author presumed advice was meant for a certain audience when it was meant for a different one. I'd hardly call that a lie. (But then that's just me complaining about petty stuff.)It was still an interesting read, so thanks for posting it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clyde Posted October 13, 2013 The thing I really got out of the article is that creativity is often judged based on the resulting product's perceived usefulness. Making the biggest mud-pie in the world isn't really considered creative unless it's baked by Banksy. The author seems to be proposing that this narrow perspective on creativity is intended for a class of people who deal in financial markets and who qualify effort by how much it money it might make. I would be willing to suggest that because we have largely become a market-society, this method of valuing things is just as common with people outside the financial sector of expertise. The author could have gone to a little more effort by explaining to us what creativity is good for, if not for money made. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eot Posted October 15, 2013 This might not be for everyone But this one is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clyde Posted January 25, 2014 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7ZVWIELHQQY Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stuart Posted January 25, 2014 Craig Ferguson is such an awesome guy. I'm amazed he's still on broadcast TV, he should be much better known and be on cable TV with his own big show. But, where he is right now, he's a beacon of comedy and introspection in an otherwise vapid, boring segment in late night broadcast TV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roderick Posted January 26, 2014 Wow, that is funny AND frank AND amazing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ucantalas Posted January 26, 2014 I'm not a big fan of that style of show, but I genuinely like listening to Craig Ferguson. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites