modeps

Yager's Spec Ops: The Line

Recommended Posts

Finished this game over the past weekend and I've gotta say, despite it being a fairly generic TPS cover based shooter, the story really drove it into awesome territory. Strange to see that kind of attention paid to it. Really fantastic work by their writing team.

Anyone else give it a go?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I heard Patrick Klepek recommend it as well. Apparently it's a mediocre FPS with some great story stuff? I find it almost hard to believe – is it worth playing for the story, even if you've become tired of run-of-the-mill FPS game-play?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't played this, but that's the prevailing opinion I've heard as well. It doesn't really bode well for the dev team, because as far as I'm aware the story was pretty much written by writers on the publishing side of things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The demo they put out was pretty legitimately awful.

It's a very subpar shooter, it plays like total shit.

People keep saying the story takes some really great turns though, and some of the character stuff they've apparently done sounds neat. (For example - Multiple animation and dialogue sets for the main characters, detailing growing frustration and exhaustion as the game progresses.)

It seems like a game that is perhaps worth taking a chance on once it hits bargin bins.

That game has had a really weird, protracted development cycle though. It went through a bunch of hands before finally hitting store shelves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is definitely a bargain bin game for me. (Which is also not a good sign for the developers). Wouldn't pay full price for a game that's half good.

Which is kind convenient looking at its current price on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co...ec ops the line

A whopping 50% off a week after release?! It's a pretty indecipherable tactic on the publisher's part, as I doubt the game was doing thaaat poorly to merit slashing the price this soon. Also probably doesn't paint a positive picture for the dev's future with this franchise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 7:09 PM, youmeyou said:

This is definitely a bargain bin game for me. (Which is also not a good sign for the developers). Wouldn't play full price for a game that's half good.

Which is kind convenient looking at its current price on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co...ec ops the line

A whopping 50% off a week after release?! It's a pretty indecipherable tactic on the publisher's part, as I doubt the game was doing thaaat poorly to merit slashing the price this soon. Also probably doesn't paint a positive picture for the dev's future with this franchise.

What makes you think it was the publisher's decision? Amazon is only marking down the downloadable version; if demand for the game was very low on Amazon (regardless of how well it is or isn't selling through other outlets), maybe this is just what Amazon felt was necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 6:42 PM, Sno said:

The demo they put out was pretty legitimately awful.

It's a very subpar shooter, it plays like total shit.

People keep saying the story takes some really great turns though, and some of the character stuff they've apparently done sounds neat. (For example - Multiple animation and dialogue sets for the main characters, detailing growing frustration and exhaustion as the game progresses.)

It seems like a game that is perhaps worth taking a chance on once it hits bargin bins.

That game has had a really weird, protracted development cycle though. It went through a bunch of hands before finally hitting store shelves.

Awful? Not at all. It's just a third person shooter. They've attempted to do a few things to make it a little different, like having ammo be something scarce and have selectable fire modes for weapons, but there's nothing that says it's any worse that other Unreal Engine based TPS games out there.

The story is really well done and honestly, it's a bit of a commentary on both war, heroism, and how dumb third person shooters are. I've heard others refer to it as more akin to Apocalypse Now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 6:37 PM, Chris said:

I haven't played this, but that's the prevailing opinion I've heard as well. It doesn't really bode well for the dev team, because as far as I'm aware the story was pretty much written by writers on the publishing side of things.

As much as I loved the story aspects, yeah... I can't see this game selling very well commercially. Two years ago, it would have been on the top of everyone's list. Now though, not quite as a sure thing.

Walt Williams self identifies with 2K, so yeah, I guess Yager just "made it work" for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like i said, i only played the demo, but it seemed like a bad shooter.

Control had a real loose feel to it, the cover system was bad, and the enemies were major bullet sponges. It just felt really muddy, nothing about it really clicked.

Ammo scarcity and selectable firing modes are not bold new features, and definitely not something to hang your hat on in the face of the above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 8:43 PM, Sno said:

Like i said, i only played the demo, but it seemed like a bad shooter.

Control had a real loose feel to it, the cover system was bad, and the enemies were major bullet sponges. It just felt really muddy, nothing about it really clicked.

Ammo scarcity and selectable firing modes are not bold new features, and definitely not something to hang your hat on in the face of the above.

The fodder enemies go down in only a few hits, and if you headshot they're done in one. The only real sponges in the game are the "Heavy" soldiers who walk around carrying a SAW. They aren't particularly awful either. There are some "elite" type soliders, that are more fully armored, but again, nothing crazy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 8:16 PM, Chris said:

What makes you think it was the publisher's decision? Amazon is only marking down the downloadable version; if demand for the game was very low on Amazon (regardless of how well it is or isn't selling through other outlets), maybe this is just what Amazon felt was necessary.

I was under the assumption that the publisher had to approve discounts on distribution sites like Amazon. Am I totally off base here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 8:50 PM, modeps said:

The fodder enemies go down in only a few hits, and if you headshot they're done in one. The only real sponges in the game are the "Heavy" soldiers who walk around carrying a SAW. They aren't particularly awful either. There are some "elite" type soliders, that are more fully armored, but again, nothing crazy.

It wasn't that, i think it was a lack of feedback, like the enemies weren't responding to being shot.

Edit: I think i'm probably remembering some details incorrectly, but I still thought that demo was terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/6/2012 at 8:52 PM, youmeyou said:

I was under the assumption that the publisher had to approve discounts on distribution sites like Amazon. Am I totally off base here?

Regardless of how 2K's agreement with Amazon works, it clearly isn't a publisher-wide markdown, because the game is still full-price on Steam and 2K's own site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes no argument there. Just curious as to their thinking on this discount in particular. Maybe an attempt to supersede pirating on the PC market or just general reluctance of PC users to buy a generic looking shooter? You have to admit even if it's solely a digital discount it's kind of an extreme case. It went up only one week after the game was put up on Steam for twice the amount.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This game. Phew.

I know that it was marketed as an in-your-face, THE-HORROR-OF-WAR game, but if you're going to make a game about the horror of war this is how you do it.

  Reveal hidden contents

I was seriously impressed with the sandstorm firefights. The stuff that seems silly and Army-of-Two-ish at the beginning turns truly brutal by the end of the game, to the point where I was wincing at my monitor at melee executions. And the script was spot-on. It begins as a parody and morphs into something really grim.

I would recommend Spec Ops The Line to fans of Metro 2033 and people who enjoyed Gears of War but thought it was trite and broseph-y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely agree with Thainatos. Played through the game and some of the places it goes narratively are pretty jaw dropping. It reminds me of a more competently made Kane & Lynch (for what it is trying to do with mechanics and how they tell a story).

A co-worker is complaining about the lack of recoil and feel to the weapons, which I think is fair but other than that the game is really solid.

Worth the money to see where they went with it and an utter surprise to me as I had expected another Call of Duty/Army of Two game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm 3 hours in. The gameplay (with a few exceptions) is rote, but the story is very interesting. I'm looking forward to finishing it the next few days and will put my full thoughts down here.

Also, I guess that Amazon deal was a good idea as I would not have bought it otherwise! If only there was more of an established space in the market for $25 games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that was quick. Finished the campaign after about 5 hours.

It's definitely a fascinating game. It kind of reminds me of a not-as-well executed Verhoven film. As in, cheesy schlock laid over serious commentary about society and human nature.

The moments I loved best were when the gameplay and the script work hand in hand.

  Reveal hidden contents

What has been said about the gameplay has been said. It's a by-the-books third person shooter. The guns feel mediocre, the stealth dynamic could have been done better, the teamplay is awkward, the radio logs should have been listenable-to while playing, and much, much more love could have been given to the characters animations and lip sync (which makes the cut-scenes kind of unbearable). It's hard to praise this game on any of those merits. But it's easy to praise it for the innovative ways it generates story from simple, rehashed building blocks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 7/12/2012 at 7:18 PM, toblix said:

Chris twote this: http://www.grantland...y-shooter-games, which is about shooters in general and this game in particular. I'm probably going to buy this game.

Yeah, I read that yesterday. Pretty fantastic writing and a great summation of shooters and Spec Ops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are making me want to play this game i already decided i didn't like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a reason to play it - but that reason is not because it's a fun well executed video game. It's not a video game really, as much as it's a statement on video games. It's just so fucking weird it's worth trying. $25 is a good price for it. I think it could have been a distilled 2-hr experience and would have been better for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This line of thought was prompted a bit by that interview and more by this article on Giant Bomb today.

  Reveal hidden contents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now